areppim: information, pure and simple

Insight : US government debt

areppim: information, pure and simple

You are here:   areppim >   Economy & finance >   US government debt

Voodoo economics and the 2008 global crisis

"There's no question about it. Wall Street got drunk. It got drunk and now it's got a hangover. The question is, how long will it sober up and not try to do all these fancy financial instruments?" [G.W.Bush, at Houston,Texas, 18 July 2008]

In 2008, the average US citizen owes somebody somewhere more than $33,500 on behalf of the US government. This is 17% more than the average $28,700 money income per person for the year (see enlarged Fig.1 chart). To put it simply, the average person should work 1 year and 2 months to repay the debt incurred by the federal administration. The bad news is that prospects are even worse. The gap between debt and income tends to grow bigger, as suggested by the logarithmic plot of the two variables (see enlarged Fig.2 chart).

On a semi log graph, income per capita was ahead of US debt per capita until 1991, the two ran roughly together until 2003, finally debt overtook and start distancing the per capita income line. From 1976 to 2003, US debt per capita was lower than per capita income, except for the years 1992 through 1999; from 2004 onwards debt exceeded income again reaching $33,700, versus $28,700 of per capita income in 2008.

Some other industrialised nations have lousy performances too. In 2007, the worst in class were Japan with a $57,000 debt per capita and a total debt amounting to 170% of GDP (gross domestic product), and Italy where the corresponding values attained $32,200 per capita and 104% of GDP. But the sum of the two economies was a mere 43.6% of US GDP, which makes the US case far more worrisome.

The current US government debt causes vertigo. On 9 October 2008 the national debt clock displayed a total debt of $10,266,382,646,544. This exceeds all the money exchanged within the USA during the full year of 2001. It is 2.3 times the estimated 2007 GDP of Japan, the second richest economy worldwide. To better grasp the concept, at the interbank exchange rate of 9 October, it is equivalent to:

Debt does not matter - or does it?

Huge US government deficits are not a rare thing. During World War II, national debt exceeded GDP. However, this was an exceptional situation, and it came down to more acceptable levels soon thereafter.

In the 1980's, Ronald Reagan's economic policy, dubbed Reaganomics, or Voodoo economics as George Bush senior called it derogatorily before becoming Reagan's Vice President, is blamed for digging huge deficits. For Reagan, deficits did not matter. The bets were placed on the "supply side economics" and the "trickle down" theories. These approaches claim that decreasing taxes, especially for corporations and wealthy people, is the best way to fuel economic growth. The cash surplus left in the hands of those beneficiaries will "trickle down" to the rest of the economy, inducing growth and employment.

Under Reagan's presidency, debt grew by 189%, at an annual average rate of 8.3%. With debt growth, also grew the numbers of people under the poverty line, homeless, without medical care, without educational assistance, without social grants, without public assistance. Inevitably average people were bound to pay more taxes to finance the deficit indeed taxes were increased during Reagan's second term.

On a semi log graph, US debt is behind the GDP, but it is closing in steadily, moving from 57%7 in 2001 to 72%2 of GDP in 2008. US government debt grew from 36% of GDP in 1976 to 64% in 1998; after a slowdown in 1999 - 2000, it accelerated its way up to reach $10 trillion or 72%2 of a $14 trillion GDP in 2008.

Debt has never been repaid. Even inflation could not redeem it. In fact it never stopped growing, except for a small period towards the end of Clinton's era in 2000 it decreased by 2% (see enlarged Fig.3 chart). Thereafter, it went for another high ride, growing by 81.3% at an annual average rate of 7.7%, under G.W.Bush's presidency the second worst debt performance after Reagan's. The trend becomes clear considering that debt represented 58.7% of GDP in 2001, to reach 66.3% in 2007, and an estimated 72.2% in 2008. As a benchmark, the Maastricht convergence criteria (see Glossary) place the ceiling at 60% tops.

Conventional wisdom holds that the big issue with debt is that it carries interest, and one must pay for debt service and amortization. Provided revenues grow faster than debt and interest rates remain under control, the problem is not insurmountable. Otherwise, a debt-powered economy will inevitably hit the wall and reach a point where it cannot service the growing debt anymore. That day the whole system goes berserk. Insolvency, hyperinflation, bankruptcy, unemployment, social unrest, anything can happen as demonstrated just a few years ago in Argentina. In fact, deficit matters a lot.

During the Bush years, the wealth of the USA as measured by GDP definitely does not grow fast enough, as shown in the semi-logarithmic graph (see enlarged Fig.4 chart). Debt is in fact growing faster than GDP - by 7.7% against 4.75% for GDP. The difference of 2.95 percentage points means that, other things remaining equal, debt will overtake GDP around 2020, in just 12 years.

The creature of Voodoo economics

At the beginning of the second term, President Bush boasted that he had created a prosperous "ownership society", thanks to his "hands off" deregulation policy, and tax cuts for the richest taxpayers. As evidence, he quoted the rising home values largely driven by the influx of cheap money.

The scheme worked for a while. But it had to be sustained by the ability of the common people to continue making regular payments. This ability in turn depends on steadfast rising home values or a continuing increase of family earnings. Sadly, all but the wealthiest have been badly beaten by falling real wages, rising healthcare and increasing education, fuel and food staples costs. To compound the problem, housing prices began to fall.

The 2008 global financial crisis, triggered by the "subprime" collapse, is by and large the creature of Voodoo economics. Bush's enhancement of the Clinton initiated "hands off" policy allowed rating agencies to mislead millions of investors, financial institutions to create unfathomable masses of toxic securities, banking and stock exchange regulatory authorities to become blind and deaf to all obnoxious practices of banking and non-banking financial institutions, and central bank authorities to care for nothing but strict monetary issues. Bush heavy spending, especially with military expenditures and the waging of two expensive wars, and the anaemic fiscal revenues due to tax cuts for the wealthy, took away all the slack that a balanced budget should provide. More debt is the only option available.

How harmful can the monster be?

High government deficits are sustainable in the long run only if:

  1. The debt to GDP ratio slows down, meaning that, whatever the level of debt, the economy grows faster;
  2. The GDP growth rate is stronger than the interest rate, meaning that the economic growth is not licked by rising interest rates.

Otherwise, debt increases today are plainly equivalent to tax increases tomorrow.

In the context of the 2008 financial crisis, with regard to the United States economy:

The potential outcomes are:

Bush's debt may well be the first stage of a runaway systemic debt. Contrary to his words quoted in the opening, the hangover is not only affecting Wall Street, but also the entire world. Hopefully it will stop short of an intoxication coma.

 

  
Download

 

[Notes

  1. Sources: (i) Debt : US Treasury, Bureau of the Public Debt http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/NPGateway-->; (ii) GDP : BEA Bureau of Economic Analysis; (iii) Per capita income : US Census Bureau (iv) various comparative data : CIA, The World Factbook.
  2. Values are in current dollars.
  3. Debt corresponds to the "total public debt outstanding", defined by the Bureau of Public Debt as all federal debt held by individuals, corporations, state or local governments, foreign governments, and other entities outside the United States and include, but are not limited to, Treasury Bills, Notes, Bonds, TIPS, United States Savings Bonds, and State and Local Government Series securities.
  4. Income per capita is defined by the US Census Bureau as the sum of money receipts from earnings, unemployment compensation, social security, public assistance, veteran's benefits, pension income, educational assistance, alimony, and other divided by the current US population.
  5. 2008 values for GDP, debt and income per capita were computed by areppim as an annualised simple average based on the source reports covering the first and second quarters of the year.]

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS!