The 2010 food price blaze has been driven mainly by the 20% price increase on sugar, 13% on oils and  11.4% on cereals, from 2003 to 2010. A growing share of these staple foods is currently used for producing ethanol and bio diesel, and new US and EU initiatives contemplate the use of much larger shares to enhance the production of substitute products for oil-derived fuels. The OECD has estimated the impact of this newer demand on the crop prices to entail increases from 6% to 35% depending upon the crops.

The 2010 blaze of food prices is driven mainly by the price increases of sugar, oils and cereals. The annual average growth rate for these commodities from 2003 through 2010 has been respectively 20%, 13% and 11%. Although price increases of dairy products (average growth rate 10%) and meat (average growth rate 5.6%) are significantly stronger than the growth of gross world product (about 3.6%), they are evidently weaker than those of the other three commodity groups.

What are the explanations for such differentials? Reliable answers would require further and deeper analysis. Nevertheless, it is relevant to note that cereals and sugar can be diverted to produce ethanol – an alcohol fuel that is currently blended with gasoline –, while vegetable oils can be transformed into bio diesel – a fuel that can be used in diesel engines –. Basic food staples are currently being taken away from our tables and pumped into our car tanks to substitute for scarce oil-derived fuels. This newer demand on food commodities contributes to the shortage of food and as a consequence feeds the process of price increase.

This is a realistic conjecture, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) ¹. In fact, OECD experts have assessed the impact of bio fuel support policies by the USA and the European Union (EU) in terms of the share of agricultural output diverted to bio fuels, and the effect on the world crop prices:

Maybe, in a not so far away future, a string of new food riots across the world will force us to face a crucial choice between using food to supply our cars or to supply our tables.

¹ Economic Assessment of Biofuel Support Policies, OECD Report, 2008.

 

Real Food Price Index¹ – Gross World Product (GWP)
Five Food Commodity Groups

Year

Meat
(Index)
Dairy
(Index)
Cereals
(Index)
Oils
(Index)
Sugar
(Index)

Gross World Product

(Index)Trillion US$ PPP ²
1990124.174.997.774.0178.368.5235,868
1991123.078.195.177.6124.869.4336,342
1992118.390.196.779.6121.470.5936,949
1993110.879.393.380.6133.471.8337,599
1994104.274.594.6102.7155.674.0738,770
1995101.393.7102.1106.9161.276.4540,018
1996115.598.4126.6100.0152.679.2841,497
1997119.1101.6108.3108.8156.082.4243,144
1998103.799.6100.3130.5127.284.4644,211
199998.687.091.092.389.787.5145,805
200098.798.387.169.9119.591.6147,954
2001102.4113.691.571.7130.193.6449,016
200296.288.4101.693.5105.196.1350,317
200396.795.198.0100.8100.599.4852,072
2004106.3114.7100.4104.995.1104.3954,642
2005112.4126.696.796.9131.2109.0757,092
2006109.1117.8111.8103.1192.9114.6460,008
2007110.0186.7146.7148.7125.7120.663,128
2008126.3180.9196.0185.7149.6123.9464,872
2009114.3121.7149.4129.0221.3123.1264,448
2010129.9171.2156.0164.8258.0  
2011141.7189.0209.1237.2358.9  
Average annual growth rate
(2003-Jan.2011)
5.61 %10.31 %11.43 %13 %19.94 %3.62 %
(2003-2009)
3.62 %
(2003-2009)
¹ Consists of the average of 5 commodity group price indices, inflation excluded, weighted with the average export shares of each of the groups for 2002-2004. The index for GWP has also a base of 2002-2004=100.
² PPP GWP is gross world product converted to international dollars using purchasing power parity rates. An international dollar has the same purchasing power over GWP as the U.S. dollar has in the United States. GWP is given in constant 2005 international US dollars.

 

Sources: see FaoStat-FAO for food prices, and World DataBank–The World Bank for gross world product data.

 

areppim logo  areppim: information, pure and simple